While by law the Federal Reserve Board must worry about price stability and unemployment, Chairman Ben Bernanke appears to have charted a third mandate for the central bank: financial stability.

In his speeches, lectures and testimony, Bernanke has steadily elevated the importance of the issue as his agency's responsibilities have swelled under Dodd-Frank.

"It's become the unofficial third goal," said Margaret Tahyar, a partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell. "It's happening very, very slowly, and it's interesting that there is a lot of messaging going on about it right now. Until recently, they've been doing it on little cat's paws quietly, quietly."

The new duty appears born out of necessity after Dodd-Frank tasked the central bank with regulating all systemically important banks and nonbanks.

The regulatory reform law also required the Fed to write new rules on a range of topics under the auspices of financial stability, including living wills, capital and liquidity requirements. Bernanke has encouraged the Fed to embrace its new role.

"It's a new piece of the Chairman's legacy," said Karen Shaw Petrou, a managing partner at Federal Financial Analytics Inc. Bernanke, like his predecessor, is seeking to use monetary policy to stabilize the economy, is "going to be judged not only on that, but whether in fact he does leave a legacy of financial regulation that promotes stability...That's never been the case before. That's never been a criterion for judging the central bank," she added.

Observers said that the central bank could promote financial stability in one of two ways. Either it can try to avoid any external shocks as seen with the burst of the housing bubble or strengthen the financial system enough so that it could withstand such shocks. The Fed, so far, has heavily leaned toward option two, although it is just getting started, observers said.

The Fed and Bernanke have also had to take stock of just how deeply integrated the global financial system was during the crisis.

"Chairman Bernanke's comments really reflect not so much a change in mission, despite all the new powers it has in Dodd-Frank, but rather a real wake-up call of what happens macro-economically when the financial system goes off the rails," said Petrou.

"They really learned, as did we all, an awesomely hard lesson in 2008. They didn't understand this fundamental linkage between macroeconomics and financial stability and now they do, and that's really what I think is behind Bernanke's comments in recent weeks and years."

To be sure, this is not the first time the Fed has contemplated the concept of financial stability, but it has returned to the forefront of the central bank's mission.

"It's not that it wasn't there before, but going through the experience of the crisis emphasized its importance," said Robin Lumsdaine, a former Federal Reserve Board official and now a professor at American University. "The crisis has led all of us to a greater focus on financial stability."

Even so, there is broad acknowledgment that the way regulators discussed financial stability before the crisis pales in comparison to today.

"I don't think we talked about it much before the crisis," said Hal Scott, Nomura Professor and Director of the Program on International Financial Systems at Harvard Law School. "The crisis made us more acutely aware of the fragility of the financial system."

But now, Bernanke is emphasizing the issue, saying financial stability should be a top priority for the central bank commensurate with its monetary policy efforts.

"Going forward, for the Federal Reserve as well as other central banks, the promotion of financial stability must be on an equal footing with the management of monetary policy as the most critical policy priorities," Bernanke said in a speech this month.

His focus has caught the attention of numerous Fed watchers.

"Given the number of speeches, the Fed clearly has embarked on a program to convince the powers that be what they should be doing in trying to maintain financial stability," said Gil Schwartz, a partner at Schwartz and Ballen and a former attorney for the Fed.

Financial stability has been largely overshadowed by fiscal policy, which has been widely considered the core purpose of central banks prior to the recent crisis.

"We've had other crises… and I think it's fair to say that none of those created the panicky fear that this crisis did," said Scott. "It's not surprising that the country and the world are more concerned with stability."

Aside from beefing up the financial system to withstand any unforeseen shocks, the Fed is also weighing how its monetary policy actions may impact financial stability. For the first time, observers say, Fed officials are connecting financial market theory with monetary policy — sometimes in wide disagreement.

"Dissent from the Federal Reserve Banks about the role of big banks… is the biggest change," said Petrou. "That's never happened before. The most interesting aspect of this debate in terms of the [Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President] Richard Fisher view is that the continued presence of 'too big to fail' banks not only has financial market stability implications, but impedes monetary policy."

Fischer and other Fed officials have called for the break up of too-big-to-fail banks.

Lawrence Goodman, president of the Center for Financial Stability, suggested the central bank's role in monitoring financial stability as two-fold when it comes to monetary policy.

First, central banks must determine whether or not their monetary policies are planting the seeds for the next crop of financial problems. Then they must do an analysis of assets throughout the financial system to determine whether a proliferation of those assets is leading to risks.

Another challenge comes from the information that regulators are able to cull to make risk assessments.

"Industry data limitations still present challenges," said Lumsdaine. "One's ability to assess the financial institution or financial stability hinges critically on the quantity, quality, and timeliness of data that's available."

How regulators are able to press ahead in developing the necessary tools will depend on the kind of cooperation or pushback from the industry.

"If you get a recognition on the side of the industry that financial stability is important for each individual firm's bottom line, then things could evolve rapidly," said Lumsdaine.

Even Bernanke acknowledges the early start of the process, while noting that it is a return to the Fed's original mission. Established by Congress in 1913, the central bank was intended to reduce the panics that risked crippling the financial system. Bernanke said in a recent lecture to business students at George Washington University, "It's now clear maintaining financial stability is just as important [of a] responsibility as monetary and economic stability.… and indeed very much a return to where the Fed came from in the beginning. Financial stability was the original goal of the creation of the Fed. So now we sort of [have] come full circle."

Donna Borak is a reporter at American Banker, a sister publication to BIC.

Register or login for access to this item and much more

All Bank Investment Consultant content is archived after seven days.

Community members receive:
  • All recent and archived articles
  • Conference offers and updates
  • A full menu of enewsletter options
  • Web seminars, white papers, ebooks

Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access